« Review of "Art for God's Sake" | Main | Review of "Preaching in the New Creation" »

Review of "1 Peter" (Word Biblical Commentary)

Posted on Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 12:22PM by Registered CommenterDanny Hyde in , | Comments4 Comments

463589-697022-thumbnail.jpg

J. Ramsey Michaels, 1 Peter, Word Biblical Commentary 49 (Waco: Word, 1988). $26.39.

Reviewed by Rev. Daniel R. Hyde

As I wind down my current series of morning sermons through 1 Peter, I would like to reflect a little on J. Ramsey Michaels' commentary for my own summary of this work, but also for the benefit of others.

Weaknesses
Let me begin with a couple of weaknesses:

First, like all commentaries in the Word series, the reader needs to endure the pages and pages of background information (e.g., the Qumran community) on every verse and word. A summary of this information would have been helpful to see the point of some of this research.

Second, there is not much theological reflection or interaction. For example, what are the implications of 2:4-10 in terms of the identity of the Israel of God in the Scriptures? (pp. 92-113) And what did this mean for Peter's audience, assuming they were primarily Gentiles? (contra Karen Jobes' recent thesis)

Third, there is no homiletical interaction during the comments or after, as this is left to the reader/preacher to take the loads of information, and craft it into a sermon (for this, see Clowney, who does not exegete the text verse by verse, but offers a sermonically outlined analysis).

Strenghts
In terms of strengths, there are many. I will name only three, as these illustrate this books' usefulness:

First, Michaels' commentary is as thorough as they come on 1 Peter in giving textual critical, grammatical, linguistic, and background analysis of the Greek text.

Second, his emphasis on Septuagintal references and allusions is extremely helpful for interpretation and preaching. Not only does this help the preacher choose an Old Testament lesson to read along with the reading from 1 Peter (a practice too many of us do not do), this also brings out the redemptive-historical and practical aspects of the text. For example, in 2:18-25, Peter begins by addressing servants who suffer for doing good, but quickly switches apply this to all Christians. At the end of the pericope, then, he refers to and applies Isaiah 53:5b-6. Yet whereas the Hebrew and LXX say, "All we like sheep have gone astray...," Peter adds the clause, "But [you] have now returned to the Shepherd and Overseer of your souls." In the fulness of times, Isaiah's statement about Israel's unfaithfulness and exile turns into an opportunity for Peter to express the work of Christ in gathering his people, of which his people should be assured.

Third, over and over again Michaels points out allusions and references to the Gospel tradition and the words of our Lord, especially his teaching on suffering for righteousness' sake. One particularly amazing example is how Peter uses a verb in 1:12, which is only used three other times in the New Testament to speak of how he stooped down to look into the tomb. Now, Peter says, the angels "long to look" (ESV) into the things we hear in the preaching of the Gospel.

Overall Recommendation
The conclusion, then, is that Michaels' work ranks at the top of commentaries on 1 Peter. As I began to delve into the Greek text and use several commentaries at the beginning of my series, texts such as I. Howard Marshall (IVP NT Commentary Series) and Peter Davids (NICNT) soon became obsolete, as I found myself turning to Michaels over and over again at the end of my exegetical work to check myself with this competent conversation partner.

Reader Comments (4)

Any other 1 Peter commentaries stand out for you, Pastor Hyde? Thanks for the post.
March 1, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterShane Lems
hi shane,

the only other commentary i have been impressed with is Karen Jobes, 1 Peter, Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2005).

i have not used it consistently throughout, but i especially found her work helpful on 3:18-22, as it was extremely thorough in explaining the major views and giving, what i think, is the best understanding (christ's ascent in triumph, not descent).
March 2, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterdanny hyde
Did I send you my (rough) translation of P. H. R. van Houwelingen's commentary?
March 5, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterJohn
yes, john, i have that and have looked at it from time to time...so far, so good (esp. on 3:18ff.)
March 5, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterdanny hyde

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.